34 reviews
7/10 - sweet intertwined romance stories may not change your life, but will certainly entertain the hopeless romantics out there and fans of Felicity Jones and or Shailene Woodley (of which I count myself as both)
- JoBloTheMovieCritic
- Jul 22, 2021
- Permalink
So good to see a feel good ol hollywood romantic drama after such a long time. They don't make these kinda movies any more for theatres and the ones they make for streaming are usually bad and they look and feel like a TV movie. But this one doesn't, this looks like it was made for big screen and it had all the charm the feel that these movies used to give us 15 years ago.
Not much to say about the story. Its slow but intriguing. Shailene Woodley is wonderful on screen and felicity jones is a delight.
Not much to say about the story. Its slow but intriguing. Shailene Woodley is wonderful on screen and felicity jones is a delight.
- soumyabratamajumder25
- Aug 2, 2021
- Permalink
I wish I had watched this before reading the book because I think I could have really enjoyed it more. I LOVED the book...devoured it in two days...so it was tough to see it essentially butchered by the movie. I will say that the movie ending gave me the goosebumps that I didn't get from the book, so bravo there. I truly think this was a good movie, but I think to really appreciate it, wait to read the book.
- kkuhl-87183
- Jul 23, 2021
- Permalink
Well I can only imagine it is based on a book. And considering the similarities I can detect with Notebook (one of the best romantic dramas to ever grace our screens or wherever you choose to watch it) ... that should not be a surprise.
Having said that, the movie has also really good actors for the different time periods it is playing and dishing out to us. You have to be inclined to like romantic movies at least a little ... otherwise do not even think about watching this. The timelines work (both) and you can see the connection (I don't think it is too hard to predict most of what is going to happen ... which is not really a bad thing ... it is the journey after all we embark on, that is the one that excites us)
Having said that, the movie has also really good actors for the different time periods it is playing and dishing out to us. You have to be inclined to like romantic movies at least a little ... otherwise do not even think about watching this. The timelines work (both) and you can see the connection (I don't think it is too hard to predict most of what is going to happen ... which is not really a bad thing ... it is the journey after all we embark on, that is the one that excites us)
Good acting good movie fun to watch one of the best netflix original movie.
- mekanikoto
- Jul 23, 2021
- Permalink
- vincentlynch-moonoi
- Jul 24, 2021
- Permalink
As are most JoJo Moyes books, this is a compelling story
Set across three time periods; present day, 1969 and 1965, the story still hangs together well and is easy to follow.
The acting is top quality with Shailene Woodley, Callum Turner and Felicity Jones all giving compelling performances. Joe Alwyn's part albeit small is very dark and controlling, very well done.
The downside is that this is a slow burner, there are several occasions when you want to press the accelerator above 1000 rpm!
There is a good creative twist at the end of the film, it certainly gives the movie the lustre that the performances of the three main characters deserves!
A special mention to the producers, set and costume designers. The locations in London and further afield are really convincing for 1965. The costumes are epic and a really enjoyable aspect of the movie, between those, the music and dancing, it certainly provided me with a nostalgia for the 1960s!
Set across three time periods; present day, 1969 and 1965, the story still hangs together well and is easy to follow.
The acting is top quality with Shailene Woodley, Callum Turner and Felicity Jones all giving compelling performances. Joe Alwyn's part albeit small is very dark and controlling, very well done.
The downside is that this is a slow burner, there are several occasions when you want to press the accelerator above 1000 rpm!
There is a good creative twist at the end of the film, it certainly gives the movie the lustre that the performances of the three main characters deserves!
A special mention to the producers, set and costume designers. The locations in London and further afield are really convincing for 1965. The costumes are epic and a really enjoyable aspect of the movie, between those, the music and dancing, it certainly provided me with a nostalgia for the 1960s!
Sumptuous music and Riviera settings help the nostalgic passionate 60s romance. Unfortunately the modern day romance was unappealing and felt unnecessary. That part should have been minimised. It was nice everyone was still around to tie things up in the present day. So the story wasn't irritating.
The casting is hit and miss.
Shaliene Woodley looks surprisingly acceptable in her 60s costume. She is more mature now but her voice is like a younger person a bit girlish. Joe Alwyn is quite convincingly cold and he is under utilised. Callum Turner was a bit weak looking as the romantic lead. But where they went wrong was the modern day couple. Felicity Jones was quite unappealing here and her love affair with the archive guy was unnecessary and unconvincing. The modern day couple were just too unromantic looking. Last performance of Ben Cross before dying. Quite poignant.
The casting is hit and miss.
Shaliene Woodley looks surprisingly acceptable in her 60s costume. She is more mature now but her voice is like a younger person a bit girlish. Joe Alwyn is quite convincingly cold and he is under utilised. Callum Turner was a bit weak looking as the romantic lead. But where they went wrong was the modern day couple. Felicity Jones was quite unappealing here and her love affair with the archive guy was unnecessary and unconvincing. The modern day couple were just too unromantic looking. Last performance of Ben Cross before dying. Quite poignant.
- phd_travel
- Feb 10, 2024
- Permalink
- GulceGencer
- Aug 17, 2022
- Permalink
The way the movie is revealed is what is most intersting. The plot is ususal rom com stuff. But the directing makes it worth the time. The male actor is good. I forgot his name and can not remember where I saw him but I know I like his work. He feels sincere. The actress is a little cold. Together, they work. It is a throwback to the old movie days. The older characters are a little disappointing.
If you liked the notebook and notting hill, you will like this moviw too.
Good romantic movie has very good scenes.
Good romantic movie has very good scenes.
I had read the book a few years ago so I was quite excited when I saw this film was being made. Films are never as good as the books they're adapted from so I go into them with lower expectations and maybe that's why I enjoyed it so much despite the details they left out.
- emzylou-09464
- Jul 25, 2021
- Permalink
Although they have given whole movie in trailer...story was somewhat already in my mind..but.last scene was so heart touching ...brought tears in my eyes...
Romantics certainly will. Especially women because it is a rare (and welcome) case of female characters leading the story. It is not really that original, I thought of The Notebook, An Affair to Remember and a few others. But romance is a genre not based in new, revolutionary, original ideas. So, it will please this audience.
Guys will have more of a tough time, for the genre, the way the characters act, and will often say "Oh, not another one jist like 300 others". It's a way of seeing it.
Older people will love it, this is not about young people and immature circumstances/decisions. This is also rare these days. The poster makes you think it is a "younger movie" - marketing.
I think it would be better if Woodley and Jones switched places. It is tough to see Felicity Jones as a real casual "airhead" person. I have the feeling they tried to avoid the obvious casting, and most times the obvious is better.
Great opportunity to see Ben Cross (Chariots of Fire) in a small role. He died in 2020.
Guys will have more of a tough time, for the genre, the way the characters act, and will often say "Oh, not another one jist like 300 others". It's a way of seeing it.
Older people will love it, this is not about young people and immature circumstances/decisions. This is also rare these days. The poster makes you think it is a "younger movie" - marketing.
I think it would be better if Woodley and Jones switched places. It is tough to see Felicity Jones as a real casual "airhead" person. I have the feeling they tried to avoid the obvious casting, and most times the obvious is better.
Great opportunity to see Ben Cross (Chariots of Fire) in a small role. He died in 2020.
- rmgaspar-49er
- Jul 23, 2021
- Permalink
A hidden gem I stumbled upon, and it left a lasting impression. Shailene Woodley shines, proving her talent as an underrated actress. Initially skeptical of the extramarital affair storyline, I was pleasantly surprised by the chemistry between the leads. As their relationship blossomed, I found myself rooting for them until the end.
The movie exudes a classic charm, reminiscent of old Hollywood romances, which adds to its allure. Additionally, the actor portraying the archivist adds a touch of charisma to the film, portraying his character with finesse.
It is a beautiful and captivating movie that resonates long after the credits roll. It's a testament to the power of love and the unexpected connections that change our lives in profound ways.
The movie exudes a classic charm, reminiscent of old Hollywood romances, which adds to its allure. Additionally, the actor portraying the archivist adds a touch of charisma to the film, portraying his character with finesse.
It is a beautiful and captivating movie that resonates long after the credits roll. It's a testament to the power of love and the unexpected connections that change our lives in profound ways.
- Pranali_Patil
- Feb 17, 2024
- Permalink
This is a well edited story about a wife married to a husband who is often away on business. As in most stories of this nature, the wife becomes intertwined with a side love interest...a true love interest. That story line takes place in 1960s London. Meanwhile, in modern day, a journalist finds a lost love letter and is intrigued enough to find the intended recipient. She finds more letters and digs into their past with the help of a 'single' historical archivist. They learn the two are still alive. Has too much time passed to rekindle true love? And of course, will the two searching for the letters get swept up and spark something between them? For a love story, this had outstanding cinematography and nice music score help to tell a creative romance story.
I think the movie was great. If the writing was a little improved I think this movie could have had so much potential. It's not a groundbreaking story, but it was done quite well. I liked the visuals and acting from all the actors. Don't expect to be blown away but it's a good watch nontheless!
- Laura_Ratings
- Apr 11, 2022
- Permalink
Was very much looking forward to this as it looked so promising, historical with felicity jones. It was cute but left me wanting more. The characters weren't developed well at all especially the present day romance and the main characters also were lacking a great deal of depth and development. I so wanted to love this and it was just ok. Decently entertaining with no substance. The clothes were amazing though and the best part. I loved all the outfits and hats, so adorable.
I really loved The Last Letter from your lover from beginning to end as i was not expecting to be so good. Its an unexpected gift of good acting combined with sensible. Stylish directing, cinematography, and a good story.
Felicity Jones as the determined journalist, did so great throughout, so as Shailene Woodley as Lawrence's wife who finds true love in the arms of her journalist loer "Mr. Boot."
Woodley has never been a fave of mine. For some reason she has never click with me. But in this movie i must admit, she is AWESOME. Could not be better.
Ues, Felicity and Woodley made wonders in this film, adding more to their already brilliant careers. The other supporting actors are fine as well, but these two mentioned ladies are the shinning stars.
You ask me if I would recommend it to you, and I say yes. You'll enjoy it.
Felicity Jones as the determined journalist, did so great throughout, so as Shailene Woodley as Lawrence's wife who finds true love in the arms of her journalist loer "Mr. Boot."
Woodley has never been a fave of mine. For some reason she has never click with me. But in this movie i must admit, she is AWESOME. Could not be better.
Ues, Felicity and Woodley made wonders in this film, adding more to their already brilliant careers. The other supporting actors are fine as well, but these two mentioned ladies are the shinning stars.
You ask me if I would recommend it to you, and I say yes. You'll enjoy it.
Delicately told are these two interwoven stories of two couples separated by different times and different social conditions. The spectator gets pulled into the movie half way through and remains emotionally attached to the characters.
Wonder performances all around and a lovely call back to An Affair to Remember, with a fittingly poignant ending.
- dawnpilkington-833-997772
- Aug 13, 2021
- Permalink
For someone who hates romance films, I really enjoyed this. The clothes and scenery from the 60s were gorgeous. Characters were believable. Would recommend.
- emmalshedden
- Aug 11, 2021
- Permalink
+ves: the lovestory part, dialogues, cinematography, music, acting performances especially by the one who played Jenny, ending
-ves: chemistry between the journalist and archival guy, acting performance of the the girl who played the role of journalist, might have showed more of Larry's character so we could have hated him a bit more, a bit more clarity regarding her daughter.
- iamahmar08
- Dec 18, 2025
- Permalink
